ReasoningSaturated
Trust Score:
25

BIG-Bench Hard

23 BIG-Bench tasks where models trailed humans — the benchmark that proved chain-of-thought prompting works, then fell to the reasoning-model era.

Launched: Refresh: static
Status Assessment (saturated):

Frontier and reasoning-tuned models exceed ~90% on the 23-task average and are near-perfect on many individual tasks; the reasoning-model era made BBH trivial. Google DeepMind built BBEH (2025) — replacing each task with a harder counterpart — precisely because BBH stopped discriminating at the top.

Performance Timeline

Longitudinal progression of model scores against human baselines.

Performance & Historical Trajectory

Empirical score progression across model release dates and evaluation rounds.

Independent Vendor-Reported Human Baseline (84.3%)
ModelScoreDateSource TypeProvenance
DeepSeek-V387.5%2024-12-26vendor-reportedSource ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (3-shot CoT)93.1%2024-06-21vendor-reportedSource ↗
Gemini 1.5 Pro (3-shot CoT)89.2%2024-05-01vendor-reportedSource ↗
Claude 3 Opus (3-shot CoT)86.8%2024-03-04vendor-reportedSource ↗
Gemini Ultra 1.0 (3-shot CoT)83.6%2023-12-06vendor-reportedSource ↗
GPT-4 (3-shot CoT)83.1%2023-03-14vendor-reportedSource ↗
PaLM 540B65.2%2022-10-17independentSource ↗
Codex (code-davinci-002)73.9%2022-10-17independentSource ↗

Human Baseline & Difficulty Horizon

Calibrated human reference points, specialist benchmarks, and ceiling thresholds.
Measured Human Score84.3%Domain Expert Baseline
Baseline Protocol & Interpretation

Human performance across the 23 hardest algorithmic and multi-step deduction subsets.

Metric & Scoring Methodology

Verification protocols, aggregation formulas, and specialized metric variants.
Primary Metric:exact-match accuracy, averaged over 23 tasks (%)
Scoring Engine:exact-match

Dataset & Compute Cost

Evaluation volume, public availability, API pricing, and local hardware requirements.
Total Dataset Size6,511Annotated evaluation items
Public Test SetPublicOpenly mirrored on repositories
Access GatingOpen AccessUnrestricted download
Evaluation LicenseOpen AccessDataset usage and redistribution terms
Frontier API Compute Cost:

$5 – $20 USD for full benchmark evaluation run on frontier APIs.

Recommended Local GPU Setup:

1x NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB) or A100 (40GB/80GB) via vLLM / SGLang

Official Dataset & Benchmark Files:Download / View Dataset Repository ↗

How to Run & Reproduce

Standardized evaluation protocols, CLI commands, and reproducible runner templates.
Prompt Regimezero-shot
Reasoning Modedirect
Sampling Temp0
Pass@k Budgetk = 1
Tools & SandboxPure Text
Scoring Verifierexact-match
Option AEleutherAI LM-Evaluation-Harness (Open-Weight Models)
lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=<model_path> --tasks big-bench-hard --batch_size auto
Option BOpenCompass Evaluation Framework
opencompass --datasets big-bench-hard --models <model_config>
Python APIDeterministic Inference Loop Snippet
# Standard API Evaluation Loop
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
    temperature=0.0,
)
Standardized Reporting Requirement:

When publishing results for BIG-Bench Hard, always report the exact prompt template, few-shot exemplar ordering, sampling temperature (temperature=0), maximum reasoning budget tokens, and the precise timestamped model snapshot ID.

Contamination & Memorization Analysis

Audit of pretraining exposure risks, memorization vectors, and refresh policies.
Overall Contamination Risk:HIGH
Refresh Cadence:

Static fixed snapshot

Test Set Exposure:

Public on web / HuggingFace